An iconic example of Rudolf Stingel’s progressive form of opulent abstraction, a result of the artist’s experimentation with collective participation, gesture and material qualities, <em>Untitled</em> is one of only twelve panels created by the acclaimed artist in this size. Hailing from Stingel's seminal investigation into graffiti during his iconic installations at the Museum of Contemporary Art in Chicago and the Whitney Museum in New York in 2007, the artist produced the present work by casting panels from the incised gallery walls, electroplating them in copper and sealing them with gold. Demonstrating a continuation of the significant themes of his practice, through the exquisite surface quality of<em> Untitled,</em> Stingel continues to captivate the viewer with his enigmatic and tactile picture surface.<br /><br />The present work belongs to Stingel’s celebrated series that originated from the artist’s site-specific 2007 Chicago and New York exhibitions. The installations saw Stingel wholly reincarnate the respective gallery spaces, plastering the walls with an expanse of Celotex, a type of easily-malleable insulation panelling. Viewers were invited to scratch, write and mark the pliable and easily punctured surface at will, their individual traces accumulating into a mass of anonymous marks. Exploring the notion of authorship, Stingel physically engaged his audiences allowing the public to become the artist en masse, creating an artwork which captured hundreds of voices. Panels from this <em>Celotex </em>series, including the present work, were electroplated with gold and later re-exhibited at the artist’s first solo show at Gagosian Gallery in Hong Kong in 2015. <em>Untitled</em> cements the passage of time as the casting seals off the marks made by visitors to the canvas, ending the works progressive creation and permanently transforming the random inscriptions into a historical and elevated artwork. <br /><br />Turning notions of authenticity, hierarchy, meaning and context on their head, in the present work the amalgamation of marks and scribbles coalesce into an abstract composition. Whilst the majority of text appears disorientating and unclear in <em>Untitled</em>, the viewer can make out several coherent words and phrases from the canvas, that of ‘ANNIE + JOE’ scrawled into the lower canvas and ‘THEM’ more heavily implemented in the upper right corner. It is unclear how much of the work’s surface has been reworked and superseded by new graffiti, however this question is the driving force behind Stingel’s multi-layered process of creation that complicates traditional ideas of authorship. As each individual creates a new gesture, aggregate in rich layers of expression, each mark loses its unique identity and becomes absorbed into a collective mass. The artist explained, ‘I hadn’t planned on this reaction. This abstract shell appeared to be perfect in a provocative way and apparently invited [each individual] to manifest [his impulse]. Numerous motives appear to have led to this behaviour; the neutrality of the installation paired with the anonymity of the visitors certainly plays a role. I wouldn’t know where to say intervention stops and destruction begins’ (Rudolf Stingel, quoted in Reiner Zettl, ‘The Trickster’, in Francesco Bonami, <em>Rudolf Stingel</em>, Chicago, 2007, p. 35).<br /><br />Casting <em>Untitled</em> in gold, Stingel transports the spoiled, incised and scribbled surface of the museum walls into an item of elaborate opulence, disrupting our preconceived expectations of this precious valuable medium. Emulating the effect of gold leaf used to adorn Byzantine mosaics or icon paintings, the work metamorphoses into a modern altar piece and site of devotion. The artist uses the precious material to encase the Celotax, completely disrupting the malleable and tactile properties of the original medium, toying with the spectator’s sensory associations. Similarly, the present work invokes the aesthetic of religious graffiti on church walls such as that as seen in the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, Jerusalem. Stingel has previously adopted religious subjects within his work, such as his compilation of black and white paintings of statues of saints which he debuted at Paula Cooper Gallery in New York in 2009. An object of adoration, the present work displays an articulation of the public’s discourse, presenting us, the collective, as the deity to be worshipped. <br /><br />In <em>Untitled, </em>the visual syntax of the public is transfigured into graffiti, its abject appearance transported from an arena, whereby the act of drawing on the walls is permitted, to the picture plane of an individual artwork. Allowing the public to deface the walls of the respective galleries, Stingel created a space where the forbidden is suddenly possible, creating an opportunistic outburst of visual signs and signifiers. At the same time, the mark making by the public may also be affected by the possible taboo nature of the drawing act, therefore creating areas of tapered and controlled graffiti which are equally valuable to our nuanced understanding of the public’s relationship to hierarchical structures, our collective sense of rules and high art. In the same way that Stingel has captured and catapulted graffiti into the realm of high art, so Jean-Michel Basquiat drew upon the vernacular of graffiti, utilising Dreyfuss’ <em>Symbol Sourcebook</em> as well as literature and popular music references, familiar visual signifiers and pictorial signs to convey a visual language made up of a multitude of sources. The very nature of graffiti is fast and forbidden, conveying the essence of repressed communication in reduced markings. Here, the objectification of Stingel’s inclusive and permitted realm of drawing provides a visual springboard for us to observe the primal language which unites us.<br /><br />Like his artistic forebears, Lucio Fontana, Jean Dubuffet, and Yves Klein, Stingel explores the quality of the picture surface, exploiting the creative potential of destruction to give rise to a three-dimensional work that fundamentally demystifies the artistic process. Curator Chrissie Iles argues, ‘Stingel goes one crucial step further, while artists from Klein and Lucio Fontana to Jean Fautrier, John Latham, Piero Manzoni, [Yoko] Ono, and Robert Rauschenberg, have all destroyed or ruptured the surface of the canvas, Stingel attacks painterly representation by drawing in the entire surrounding space’ (Chrissie Iles, “Surface Tension”, in Francesco Bonami, <em>Rudolf Stingel</em>, Chicago, 2007, p. 25). <br /><br />Having become a significant figure in the New York art scene in the late 1980s, Stingel gained notoriety for his 1989 manual titled <em>Instructions,</em> a self-published artist’s book that identifies and illustrates the tools and steps needed to make a painting. Acting as a basis for the present work, through his instructional photographs, like much of his work, the manual explores the essence of making, gesture and expression through questioning authenticity and authorship. Often inviting the audience to interact with his work, Stingel promulgates the artistic process, allowing his artworks to develop as public ‘collaborations.’ The artist has continued to produce pieces which constantly play with the limitations and restrictions of the process of making art, exemplified in the inclusive nature of <em>Untitled.</em> <br /><br />Central to Stingel’s oeuvre is his palpable rendering of the passage of time, which is exaggerated within the present work through its evident traces of its previous formulation. As Gary Carrion-Murayari writes, ‘For Stingel painting is not just representational – it’s always relating to materiality, and physical change within a temporal space. Stingel’s paintings rely on and point of an expanding meaning of time (Gary Carrion-Murayari, ed., <em>Rudolf Stingel, At the Museum of Contemporary Art, Chicago and the Whitney Museum of American Art</em>, exh. cat., Ostfildern, 2008, p. 112). Having exhibited at the 1993 and 2003 Venice Biennale, Stingel’s reputation has continued to flourish alongside his experimentations with new media and new forms of artistic expression. Ultimately, the genius of <em>Untitled</em> lies within the fact that we are viewing a series of isolated, physical memories cast from a collective and public experience. Participatory in nature and primal in its visual syntax, <em>Untitled</em> presents art at its most inclusive, showing us more about the society we live in with its incorporation of a multitude of viewpoints.
electroformed copper, plated nickel and gold, in 4 parts
This work is in 4 parts. The work is structurally sound. Each panel is supported by a steel angle armature. There are two minor areas of faint surface discolouration to the upper left vertical outer edges of the upper two panels, not affecting the face of the work, and some occasional very small spots of Verdigris, all inherent to the electroforming process. There are a small number of faint surface scratches to the upper outer edges of the the two lower panels, not visible when fully installed and deemed inherent to the nature of the materials used. There are no apparent condition issues with this work.
Hong Kong, Gagosian Gallery, <em>Rudolf Stingel</em>, 12 March - 9 May 2015
<a href="mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org">Henry Highley</a><br /> Specialist, Head of Evening Sale<br /> + 44 20 7318 4061 <a href="mailto:email@example.com">firstname.lastname@example.org</a><br />
overall 240 x 240 cm (94 1/2 x 94 1/2 in.)
Gagosian Gallery, Hong Kong<br />Acquired from the above by the present owner
<p>Rudolf Stingel came to prominence in the late 1980s for his insistence on the conceptual act of painting in a context in which it had been famously declared dead. Despite the prevailing minimalist and conceptual narrative of the time, the Italian-born artist sought to confront the fundamental aspirations and failures of Modernist painting through the very medium of painting itself. While his works do not always conform to the traditional definitions of painting, their attention to surface, space, color and image provide new and expanded ways of thinking about the process and "idea" of painting. Central to his multifarious and prolific oeuvre is an examination of the passage of time and the probing of the fundamental questions of authenticity, meaning, hierarchy, authorship and context by dislocating painting both internally and in time and space. Stingel is best known for his wall-to-wall installations, constructed of fabric or malleable Celotex sheets, as well as his seemingly more traditional oil-on-canvas paintings.</p>